Filmmaker Escalates Allegations of Corruption in Indiana Courts

The upcoming film, Three Corners of Deception 2, centers on a narrative of systemic retaliation. Clary-Ghosh contends that the judicial figures involved in her previous divorce litigation intensified their efforts to silence her rather than addressing the concerns raised in her first installment. She describes an ongoing war of attrition where public exposure is met with increasingly aggressive procedural tactics.

Specific claims in the production include the unauthorized modification of child support orders, the back-dating of financial arrearages, and the strategic omission of legal actions from the public Chronological Case Summary. The filmmaker asserts that these maneuvers are designed to hinder appeals and evade oversight. While the film identifies several court officials by their initials, supporters have linked the allegations to specific legal practitioners, including attorney Michael Ghosh and Jane G. Cotton.

Clary-Ghosh promises that the sequel will feature video evidence of judges signing documents without reviewing underlying evidence and holding private proceedings to circumvent standard legal requirements. These accusations move beyond her personal grievances, framing the situation as a broader failure of judicial integrity. While her previous work faced criticism for its production quality, the sequel is positioned as a direct challenge to the state's judiciary, intending to force a public reckoning through the presentation of what the filmmaker calls irrefutable proof.